From: | "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. | ||
Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 17:39:37 | ||
Message-Id: | 4BE05BA3.1000509@xunil.at | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. by walt |
1 | Am 04.05.2010 18:54, schrieb walt: |
2 | |
3 | >> pam_mount(mount.c): crypt_activate_by_passphrase: Operation not |
4 | >> permitted |
5 | > |
6 | > I don't have a pam_mount, where does it come from? Perhaps it needs |
7 | > a reference to pam_ssh.so? |
8 | |
9 | What do you mean with "where does it come from?" ? |
10 | |
11 | It's in portage ... for example |
12 | |
13 | http://home.coming.dk/index.php/2009/05/20/encrypted_home_partition_using_luks_pam_ |
14 | |
15 | shows how to make use of it. |
16 | |
17 | I am not sure which HOWTO I followed ... but it is the same approach. |
18 | What would the reference to pam_ssh.so look like? |
19 | |
20 | |
21 | Googling for "crypt_activate_by_passphrase" I found: |
22 | |
23 | http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/issues/detail?id=58 |
24 | |
25 | which says: |
26 | |
27 | "crypt_activate_by_passphrase is the new API" |
28 | |
29 | Could it be the case that my current setup somehow uses "the new API" |
30 | which isn't available yet in some package? |
31 | |
32 | I don't yet have the whole picture ... |
33 | |
34 | Thanks, Stefan |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. | "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at> |
[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> |