Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: walt <w41ter@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure.
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 17:39:37
Message-Id: 4BE05BA3.1000509@xunil.at
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. by walt
1 Am 04.05.2010 18:54, schrieb walt:
2
3 >> pam_mount(mount.c): crypt_activate_by_passphrase: Operation not
4 >> permitted
5 >
6 > I don't have a pam_mount, where does it come from? Perhaps it needs
7 > a reference to pam_ssh.so?
8
9 What do you mean with "where does it come from?" ?
10
11 It's in portage ... for example
12
13 http://home.coming.dk/index.php/2009/05/20/encrypted_home_partition_using_luks_pam_
14
15 shows how to make use of it.
16
17 I am not sure which HOWTO I followed ... but it is the same approach.
18 What would the reference to pam_ssh.so look like?
19
20
21 Googling for "crypt_activate_by_passphrase" I found:
22
23 http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/issues/detail?id=58
24
25 which says:
26
27 "crypt_activate_by_passphrase is the new API"
28
29 Could it be the case that my current setup somehow uses "the new API"
30 which isn't available yet in some package?
31
32 I don't yet have the whole picture ...
33
34 Thanks, Stefan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at>
[gentoo-user] Re: Kernel upgrade and now LUKS failure. walt <w41ter@×××××.com>