1 |
* walt <w41ter@×××××.com> [07.12.2010. @11:44:18 -0800]: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 12/06/2010 12:07 PM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: |
4 |
> > * walt<w41ter@×××××.com> [06.12.2010. @11:44:12 -0800]: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> >> On 12/06/2010 11:11 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: |
7 |
> >>> Hi all, |
8 |
> >>> |
9 |
> >>> I am using mutt and gnupg for my mail and I do not understand something: |
10 |
> >>> when I sign and send an email, my gpg signature appears as an attached |
11 |
> >>> "noname" file while friends have an attached "signature.asc" file. |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> I notice that the mutt ebuild reads two different useflags concerning gpg: |
14 |
> >> 'crypt' and 'gpg'. Do you have them both enabled? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Yes, I do. Should I have only one of them ? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Heh. I have no idea -- but I would try fiddling with them to see what |
19 |
> difference it may make. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Does your attached 'noname' file contain an appropriate ascii sig? |
22 |
|
23 |
Yes, it seems to be OK and friends are able to check my signed mails |
24 |
without any problem. It is not an important problem, but it is very |
25 |
strange. |
26 |
|
27 |
JC |