Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jean-Christophe Bach <jc.bach@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mutt+gnupg: how do you name the attached signature file ?
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:16:16
Message-Id: 20101207231403.GB460@Sauron
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: mutt+gnupg: how do you name the attached signature file ? by walt
1 * walt <w41ter@×××××.com> [07.12.2010. @11:44:18 -0800]:
2
3 > On 12/06/2010 12:07 PM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
4 > > * walt<w41ter@×××××.com> [06.12.2010. @11:44:12 -0800]:
5 > >
6 > >> On 12/06/2010 11:11 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
7 > >>> Hi all,
8 > >>>
9 > >>> I am using mutt and gnupg for my mail and I do not understand something:
10 > >>> when I sign and send an email, my gpg signature appears as an attached
11 > >>> "noname" file while friends have an attached "signature.asc" file.
12 > >>
13 > >> I notice that the mutt ebuild reads two different useflags concerning gpg:
14 > >> 'crypt' and 'gpg'. Do you have them both enabled?
15 > >
16 > > Yes, I do. Should I have only one of them ?
17 >
18 > Heh. I have no idea -- but I would try fiddling with them to see what
19 > difference it may make.
20 >
21 > Does your attached 'noname' file contain an appropriate ascii sig?
22
23 Yes, it seems to be OK and friends are able to check my signed mails
24 without any problem. It is not an important problem, but it is very
25 strange.
26
27 JC

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mutt+gnupg: how do you name the attached signature file ? Jean-Christophe Bach <jc.bach@×××××.com>