1 |
On 12/06/2010 12:07 PM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: |
2 |
> * walt<w41ter@×××××.com> [06.12.2010. @11:44:12 -0800]: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On 12/06/2010 11:11 AM, Jean-Christophe Bach wrote: |
5 |
>>> Hi all, |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> I am using mutt and gnupg for my mail and I do not understand something: |
8 |
>>> when I sign and send an email, my gpg signature appears as an attached |
9 |
>>> "noname" file while friends have an attached "signature.asc" file. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> I notice that the mutt ebuild reads two different useflags concerning gpg: |
12 |
>> 'crypt' and 'gpg'. Do you have them both enabled? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Yes, I do. Should I have only one of them ? |
15 |
|
16 |
Heh. I have no idea -- but I would try fiddling with them to see what |
17 |
difference it may make. |
18 |
|
19 |
Does your attached 'noname' file contain an appropriate ascii sig? |