| 1 |
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you |
| 6 |
> > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >... |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong |
| 11 |
> > version. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Ironically enough, your last sentence overflowed my parsing stack. :) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Rich |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I am guessing: |
| 19 |
" I think it is not unlikely that you don't want the strong version" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
parses to: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
" I think it is likely that you don't want the strong version " |
| 24 |
or: " I think it is unlikely that you want the strong version" |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Joost |
Archives