Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:08:27
Message-Id: 20140923140750.GC23337@TranscendTheRubicon.alshain.ring0
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error by "J. Roeleveld"
1 On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:20PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
2 >
3 > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
4 > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
5 > >
6 > > <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote:
7 > > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you
8 > > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one.
9 > > >
10 > > >...
11 > > >
12 > > > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong
13 > > > version.
14 > >
15 > > Ironically enough, your last sentence overflowed my parsing stack. :)
16 > >
17 > > --
18 > > Rich
19 >
20 > I am guessing:
21 > " I think it is not unlikely that you don't want the strong version"
22 >
23 > parses to:
24 >
25 > " I think it is likely that you don't want the strong version "
26 > or: " I think it is unlikely that you want the strong version"
27 >
28 > ?
29
30 Thanks for translating me! ;-)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature