1 |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:20PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 08:47:31 AM Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
7 |
> > > '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you |
8 |
> > > upgrade, you'll forced to use the regular one. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > >... |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong |
13 |
> > > version. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Ironically enough, your last sentence overflowed my parsing stack. :) |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > -- |
18 |
> > Rich |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I am guessing: |
21 |
> " I think it is not unlikely that you don't want the strong version" |
22 |
> |
23 |
> parses to: |
24 |
> |
25 |
> " I think it is likely that you don't want the strong version " |
26 |
> or: " I think it is unlikely that you want the strong version" |
27 |
> |
28 |
> ? |
29 |
|
30 |
Thanks for translating me! ;-) |