| 1 |
Randy Barlow <randy@×××××××××××××××××.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I will also participate on this thread hijack (but Hal, don't hijack |
| 4 |
> anymore. It makes your mom angry!) I would actually check more than |
| 5 |
> just /etc/pam.d/* if you don't find it there because it's possible for |
| 6 |
> mail servers or web servers to use these things the old way too! |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Me too but Randy's advice is important. An angry mom can ruin your |
| 9 |
day... hehe |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
* Your current setup is using one or more of the following modules, |
| 12 |
* that are not built or supported anymore: pam_pwdb, pam_radius, |
| 13 |
* pam_timestamp, pam_console If you are in real need for these |
| 14 |
* modules, please contact the maintainers of PAM through |
| 15 |
* http://bugs.gentoo.org/ providing information about its use |
| 16 |
* cases. Please also make sure to read the PAM Upgrade guide at |
| 17 |
* the following URL: |
| 18 |
* http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/pam/upgrade-0.99.xml |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I got that non-sense a while ago too and never did find anything but |
| 21 |
commented lines. I think the warning may be invoked improperly |
| 22 |
under some conditions. But others more knowledgeable may disagree. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
My solution was to uninstall the current pam completely disregarding |
| 25 |
dependencies, and then emerge the new one. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
It worked here but please BE CAREFUL I think its possible to cause |
| 28 |
some problems since we are dealing with things like login. Definitely |
| 29 |
don't try it remotely. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives