| 1 |
Am 21.04.2010 11:09, schrieb Stroller: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> OK, a bit more RAM wouldn't hurt here. |
| 4 |
>> But I am compiling stuff right now. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I would add more. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Services mysteriously dying, surely that could be because the kernel is |
| 9 |
> killing them off due to an out-of-memory condition? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Shouldn't the kernel *swap* then ? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I suggested adding RAM there, sure ... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Maybe you have changed to a different compiler version in the past, and |
| 16 |
> this creates larger binaries? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
current version of gcc: 4.3.2-r3 (04:13:52 18.04.2009) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
So it is about one year old, no changes since then. The symptoms only |
| 21 |
started some week ago or two ... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I rather wonder about that f-secure scanner "fsav" ... I had to manually |
| 24 |
fiddle it onto the system and it takes quite much ram and cpu. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
But it is installed since june 2009 as well. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> I seem to get into more trouble when I'm cautious with updates than I do |
| 29 |
> when I just let 'em rip as often as possible. More frequent updates |
| 30 |
> means fewer updates. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I have to find some sweet spot here. I have quite many servers out there |
| 33 |
at customers sites ... noone so far pays me for regularly emerging world |
| 34 |
there ... this has to change, you are right ;-) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Stefan |
Archives