| 1 |
On Monday 17 February 2014 04:12 AM, Edward M wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:14:24 +0530 |
| 3 |
> Nilesh Govindrajan <me@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> rvices to customers, so compatibility is |
| 6 |
>> definitely a concern. I'm not exactly sure what the differences are |
| 7 |
>> between Oracle JDK & OpenJDK; the differences I found so far on Google |
| 8 |
>> are old and make sense only for Java 6. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Hello, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> To my understanding, Oracle JDK binary is created from the source code |
| 13 |
> released from the OpenJDK project with some Oracle's own propriety |
| 14 |
> code. The other difference is Oracle's JDK binary is released under |
| 15 |
> Oracle Technology Network Developer License Terms for JAVA EE SDK,JDK |
| 16 |
> where as OpenJDK code is under GPL + linking exceptions. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> More info at: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/java_7_questions_answers |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Best regards |
| 23 |
> ED |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So it would be correct to say that for Java EE applications, icedtea |
| 27 |
would be enough? As per the link you gave me, it says some graphical |
| 28 |
components & fonts are extra, none of which are used in case of web |
| 29 |
applications. |
Archives