1 |
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:55 PM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Grant <emailgrant <at> gmail.com> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> I've only ever used systems with a single CPU. I'm looking for a new host for |
6 |
> a dedicated server (suggestions?) and it looks like I'll probably choose a |
7 |
> machine with two or four CPUs. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> NUMA is specialization, imho: |
10 |
> http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-4-esx-vcenter/index.jsp?topic=/com.vmware.vsphere.resourcemanagement.doc_41/using_numa_systems_with_esx_esxi/c_what_is_numa.html |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The more cores the better. 6 and 8 are readily available. |
13 |
> The 6 core AMD near 4 GHz is the sweet spot, imho. |
14 |
> Here is a 4 core on sale at Newegg: AMD FX-4170 Zambezi 4.2GHz |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
That depends greatly on the applications he's running. If the |
18 |
application(s) is(are) memory bound or I/O bound, more cores doesn't |
19 |
necessarily mean better performance. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
> If you run a feature rich desktop (kde, gnome, etc) then the more cores the |
23 |
> better. Compiling code is much faster and you can still have a snappy |
24 |
> desk top. Most gentoo folks compile quite a bit of code, depending on your |
25 |
> updates and how often you experiment with new features or software. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I'm setting up some new FX-8350 machines, but fully flushed out, there |
28 |
> around a 1K (USD). Surely you can replace a mobo with a quad and as much ram as |
29 |
> will fit, and get a fine machine. CPU speed, for me, is the dominate feature, |
30 |
> when you are only doing a few things for a snappy workstation. Lots of cores and |
31 |
> low CPU speed and low ram, sucks, imho. Max amount and max speed of the RAM |
32 |
> is the killer performance edge for most workstations, imho. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
MHO and experience is that you need a balanced system, IOW: if you |
36 |
have a whole bunch of cores and GHz but crappy drive ... say bye to |
37 |
performance, you'll be getting iowaits and your cores will be idle :( |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
> It boils down to a personal decision. The world of software |
41 |
> is migrating to multi-threading, so the more cores, the |
42 |
> more future-proof, imho. |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
MHO: it boils down to the software he's running ;) |
46 |
|
47 |
Rafa |