Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: Letsencrypt (was Re: [gentoo-user] app-misc/ca-certificates) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 01 Jun 2021 12:17:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 9e56e085f91a57cfe81f857675118517f12ea5b8.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: Letsencrypt (was Re: [gentoo-user] app-misc/ca-certificates) by Peter Humphrey |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 13:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > So what would you recommend for someone in the case Joost cites? I'm in that |
| 4 | > position, being a home user of a small network but no registered Internet |
| 5 | > name. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | A self-signed certificate combined with a browser extension that lets |
| 9 | you "pin" it. With pinning, you can keep your browser usable on the WWW |
| 10 | while still rejecting any forged certificates for your own hosts. The |
| 11 | end result works pretty much like SSH keys do. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: Letsencrypt (was Re: [gentoo-user] app-misc/ca-certificates) | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: Letsencrypt (was Re: [gentoo-user] app-misc/ca-certificates) | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |