1 |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 07:48:12AM -0800, Grant wrote |
2 |
> Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking |
3 |
> at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like |
4 |
> things being improved as quickly as possible. |
5 |
|
6 |
One item (amongst many) that chased me away from Windows was the |
7 |
upgrade treadmill... |
8 |
1993 Win3.1 |
9 |
1994 Win3.11 |
10 |
1995 Win95 |
11 |
1996 Win95OSr2 |
12 |
1997 And on the 1997th year, Go^H^H Gates rested |
13 |
1998 Win98 |
14 |
1999 Win98SE |
15 |
2000 WinME and Win2K |
16 |
2001 WinXP |
17 |
|
18 |
Remember that Gentoo is a linux distro, meaning that it is an |
19 |
implementation based on Linus Torvalds' baby. You may be thinking back |
20 |
to the early days of Kernel 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, etc, etc. For whatever |
21 |
reason, 2.6 has been around for 4 years, with no signs of being |
22 |
replaced. Gentoo can't do much about that, or do you want to fork the |
23 |
linux kernel? There have been a lot of "minor" improvements that, taken |
24 |
together, have led to major overall improvement. |
25 |
|
26 |
Basically, linux has caught up to Windows, indeed 64-bit linux has |
27 |
been better than 64-Windows for the past year. |
28 |
|
29 |
> The concept is second to none, the execution of that concept is |
30 |
> fantastic, but it needs to keep moving forward. |
31 |
|
32 |
Do you have a list of significant improvements you want implemented? |
33 |
There were gaping holes in linux's abilities in the past. These |
34 |
problems have been fixed. Change simply for the sake of change is a |
35 |
relic of the Windows era. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
39 |
I'm not repeating myself |
40 |
I'm an X Window user... I'm an ex-Windows-user |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |