| 1 |
On Sunday 14 February 2010 11:32:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial |
| 4 |
> > > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably |
| 5 |
> > > the majority, won't be flaged at all. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > so does cfg-update.... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - |
| 10 |
> and I give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and |
| 11 |
> always go back to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with |
| 12 |
> it, I just prefer (or am used to) conf-update. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I |
| 15 |
> would welcome it with open arms though. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm still using etc-update, which seems adequate except when squid is |
| 18 |
upgraded, but I thought I'd try cfg-update. Problem though: it demands |
| 19 |
dev-util/xxdiff which doesn't exist. What's a suitable substitute? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Rgds |
| 23 |
Peter. |
Archives