1 |
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial |
4 |
> > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the |
5 |
> > majority, won't be flaged at all. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> so does cfg-update.... |
8 |
|
9 |
Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - and I |
10 |
give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and always go back |
11 |
to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with it, I just prefer (or |
12 |
am used to) conf-update. |
13 |
|
14 |
I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I would |
15 |
welcome it with open arms though. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Neil Bothwick |
20 |
|
21 |
The modem is the message. |