1 |
On Sunday 14 February 2010 11:32:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > > On a more serious note, conf-update automatically merges trivial |
4 |
> > > changes, so any configs you ran at the default, which is probably the |
5 |
> > > majority, won't be flaged at all. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > so does cfg-update.... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Every now and then, someone mentions cfg-update - usually you :) - and I |
10 |
> give it another try, but I don't really get on with it and always go back |
11 |
> to conf-update. There's nothing specific wrong with it, I just prefer (or |
12 |
> am used to) conf-update. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I expect that if I were still using etc-update or dispatch-conf I would |
15 |
> welcome it with open arms though. |
16 |
|
17 |
You make me feel out of touch with Gentoo! Is dispatch-conf and etc-update |
18 |
that bad then? |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Regards, |
21 |
Mick |