| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:29 AM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement |
| 7 |
> which is at least as good as FTP? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and |
| 10 |
> missing features. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> -- |
| 14 |
> "Didn't work" is an error. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
The one issue I have with all the answers I've seen is that they all lack |
| 18 |
the most important question. You're asking for alternatives for an old tool |
| 19 |
that was used for many use cases that, these days, have evolved to have |
| 20 |
very different requirements for security, integration of access methods, |
| 21 |
and general workflows for use. FTP used to be the go-to for long distance |
| 22 |
file sharing for *all* use cases, one to one (user managing a website's |
| 23 |
content), many to one (upload site), one to many (download site), etc. |
| 24 |
What's your use case? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Poison [BLX] |
| 28 |
Joshua M. Murphy |
Archives