| 1 |
Am 23.11.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Nicolas Sebrecht: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:25:26PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> and you want portage to finish on this site of eternity when looking for |
| 5 |
>> dependency resolution? |
| 6 |
> I don't think having exposed requirements would explode the time needed |
| 7 |
> to calculate the dependency tree because this does not add paths to the |
| 8 |
> tree. It only validates or invalidates paths. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> And if time for dependency resolution would become a real problem, there |
| 11 |
> are ways to solve that. One could be making pre-calcultated caches of |
| 12 |
> parts of tree/paths. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
which works so well with different useflags. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
portage is already almost unbearable slow. The 'distributed model' would |
| 18 |
add so much complexity, we can forget USE. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
For what gains? |
Archives