Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ?
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:54:29
Message-Id: 20141123185416.GD2139@vidovic.ultras.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ? by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:25:26PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
2
3 > and you want portage to finish on this site of eternity when looking for
4 > dependency resolution?
5
6 I don't think having exposed requirements would explode the time needed
7 to calculate the dependency tree because this does not add paths to the
8 tree. It only validates or invalidates paths.
9
10 And if time for dependency resolution would become a real problem, there
11 are ways to solve that. One could be making pre-calcultated caches of
12 parts of tree/paths.
13
14 --
15 Nicolas Sebrecht

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future directtion ? Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>