1 |
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 10:20:39PM +0200, Gerhard Hoogterp wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 25 June 2006 22:02, John J. Foster wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:46:16PM -0700, Lord Sauron wrote: |
4 |
> > > I have it on extremely good authority that it goes 2MB/sec. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > it's always a good thing to question authority. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Well, the used protocol has to do with it too.. and what I remember from my |
9 |
> BBS days is that kermit is extremely reliable and runs on more or less |
10 |
> everything, but also that it does give a new meening to the word slow.. |
11 |
> zmodem or even sealink would already improve a lot.. |
12 |
> |
13 |
Man, this thread hurts. I _had_ forgotten fighting kermit to communicate |
14 |
to a Prime 650 (running Primos 18 something I think). God that was |
15 |
awful! |
16 |
|
17 |
later, |
18 |
festus |
19 |
-- |
20 |
It is not unusual for those at the wrong end of the club to have a |
21 |
clearer picture of reality than those who wield it. |
22 |
Noam Chomsky |