| 1 |
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 06:44:47 -0500 |
| 2 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Should I include the drive itself? Like sda, sdb etc. I could use |
| 5 |
> my system name too. I'm on fireball and my older rig is named |
| 6 |
> smoker. See a trend here? lol Anyway, this could work: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> fireball-sda |
| 9 |
> fireball-sdb |
| 10 |
> fireball-sdc |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's not a good naming scheme, the names depend on what a specific |
| 13 |
machine will do with them. Rather come up with a naming scheme that |
| 14 |
depends on what the drive IS |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
dale-seagate-old 320G |
| 17 |
dale-seagate-new-660G |
| 18 |
dale-quantum-73G |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
or what you intend to DO with it |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
dale-root-oldrig |
| 23 |
dale-photos-small |
| 24 |
dale-photos-big |
| 25 |
dale-music |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Alan McKinnnon |
| 30 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives