Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:56:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140602115624.214cbdbe@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? by Dale |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log |
| 4 | > out but leave my computer on, leave home, some crook/NSA type breaks in |
| 5 | > and tries to access something or steals my whole puter, they would just |
| 6 | > get garbage for data. That seems to fit the second option best. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | If they steal your computer they will have to power it off, unless you |
| 9 | are kind enough to leave them a large enough UPS to steal along with it, |
| 10 | so any encryption will be equally effective. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Capt'n! The spellchecker kinna take this abuse! |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? | "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? | Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> |