| 1 |
You need to pay more attention to details. Only virtual/pam has been masked |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
# required by virtual/pam (argument) |
| 4 |
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: |
| 5 |
# Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o> (2019-10-16) |
| 6 |
# not needed due to openpam removal. Please |
| 7 |
# update your packages running emerge with the |
| 8 |
# --changed-deps option if you have problems |
| 9 |
# with your system. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
sys-libs/pam is still there. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On 10/31/19 10:10 AM, Alan Grimes wrote: |
| 14 |
> <paranoia> |
| 15 |
> Emperor penguin, brooding as usual: "I'm bored, how can we fuck with the |
| 16 |
> users this week?" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Chancelor penguin: "we can mask PAM for no reason. It has never caused |
| 19 |
> anyone any problem but removing it will drive the users crazy for days |
| 20 |
> trying to get their system working when they do emergency updates to try |
| 21 |
> to fix the instability you caused last month when you let the kernel get |
| 22 |
> out of sync with nvidia drivers to punish them for using proprietary |
| 23 |
> drivers when, for many years those were the only ones that would work.." |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Emperor penguin: "Really, could it be possible?!" |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Chancelor Penguin: "Well, there's a 90% chance that the entire system |
| 28 |
> can be built with pam disabled but it will require a massive re-build |
| 29 |
> and disabling several dozen default-on useflags and r-dep packages to be |
| 30 |
> removed. It will take the users DAYS AND DAYS! To solve it!" |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- Later that day the emperor addressed a throng of tens of thousands of |
| 33 |
> penguins -- |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Emperor Penguin "...Today, we once again re-assert our penguinosity by |
| 36 |
> wasting yet more of the user's time with no reason whatsoever..." |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Crowd: "MASK PAM! MASK PAM! MASK PAM!!! LONG LIVE THE EMPEROR!!!" |
| 39 |
> </paranoia> |
| 40 |
> |
Archives