| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 13:56:44 schrieb Alex Schuster: |
| 5 |
>> Alan McKinnon writes: |
| 6 |
>> > On Tue 23 August 2011 18:17:17 Stroller did opine thusly: |
| 7 |
>> > > On 23 August 2011, at 07:27, Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
| 8 |
>> [...] |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> > > > And I don't really see the point of D-BUS on a server either. |
| 11 |
>> > > > All the services that need to talk to each other already have |
| 12 |
>> > > > working communication paths. |
| 13 |
>> > > |
| 14 |
>> > > Reading that blog entry I found discouraging the idea that dbus |
| 15 |
>> > > might be required on my servers in the future, if systemd becomes |
| 16 |
>> > > popular with distros. |
| 17 |
>> > |
| 18 |
>> > What's your objection to dbus? It gives you a standard message bus, is |
| 19 |
>> > small, light, consumes minimal resources and provides a nice standard |
| 20 |
>> > way to do IPC. Probably easier than reinventing the wheel with named |
| 21 |
>> > pipes and other bits over and over. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Except for me. dbus-daemon often uses 10-20% of my CPU according to top. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Mine idles most of the time, no CPU is used. My computer is running for ~6h |
| 26 |
> now, dbus-daemon used less than 1.5s CPU time. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Same here: |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
canek@negra ~ $ uptime |
| 31 |
11:01:52 up 5 days, 20:13, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.43, 0.50 |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
(It's a laptop that I usually suspend at night). |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
>> And |
| 36 |
>> this morning, it was using about 750M of memory. Which is less than kwin's |
| 37 |
>> and Kontact's usage, but still. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Strange. Mine uses only ~20MB. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Same here: |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
top - 11:02:40 up 5 days, 20:14, 1 user, load average: 0.12, 0.39, 0.49 |
| 44 |
Tasks: 163 total, 1 running, 158 sleeping, 0 stopped, 4 zombie |
| 45 |
Cpu(s): 7.3%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 90.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.5%si, 0.0%st |
| 46 |
Mem: 3891064k total, 3214892k used, 676172k free, 36072k buffers |
| 47 |
Swap: 4192960k total, 708604k used, 3484356k free, 863416k cached |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND |
| 50 |
631 messageb 20 0 20548 2404 1040 S 0 0.1 1:47.94 dbus-daemon |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
>> But I think the problem is on my side, I run KDE4 with only 8G of memory, no |
| 54 |
>> wonder I need 1.7G of swap right now. |
| 55 |
>> </rant> |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> I have only 4GB of memory, run kde4, swap is not used at all most of the time. |
| 58 |
> There are still ~512MB free with ~1,3GB cached currently. |
| 59 |
> I do have programs running :) firefox with some tabs, kdevelop with a project |
| 60 |
> (~100.000 LOC), kmail, LibreOffice and 3 konsoles, each with some tabs open. |
| 61 |
> I know, I am of no help at all, but I really wonder, why your numbers differ so |
| 62 |
> significantly from mine. |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
Kinda similar here: GNOME 3.0, Emacs with several LaTeX articles, |
| 65 |
Evince, Evolution, Rhythmbox, Chromium with like 20 tabs (my 4 zombie |
| 66 |
processes are Chromium tabs), and the heaviest of all, Inkscape with 6 |
| 67 |
different SVG pictures. |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
There is something really wrong with Alex D-Bus; but I don't think |
| 70 |
it's the bus. Probably some program is spamming the bus, making it use |
| 71 |
that much memory, but I don't know for sure. |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
Regards. |
| 74 |
-- |
| 75 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 76 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 77 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives