Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] Re: pdftk - replacement
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:27:18
Message-Id: p8gul3$k52$1@blaine.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [SOLVED] Re: pdftk - replacement by thelma@sys-concept.com
1 On 2018-03-16, thelma@×××××××××××.com <thelma@×××××××××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 03/15/2018 11:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
3
4 >>> Instead of removing pdftk from the portage tree because it depends on
5 >>> gcc-5.4 [gcj], is there any reason it can't be replace by the one
6 >>> which uses a jvm instead?
7 >>
8 >> Someone needs to maintain it as well.
9 >
10 > From the "pdftk-9999 --help"
11 > -----quote----------
12 > AUTHOR
13 > Sid Steward (sid.steward at pdflabs dot com) maintains pdftk. Please
14 > email him with questions or bug reports. Include pdftk in the
15 > subject
16 > line to ensure successful delivery. Thank you.
17 > -----end quote-------
18
19 Sid Steward is the "maintainer" of the original Java/C++ version of
20 pdftk that lives at https://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/.
21
22 The last change was almost 5 years ago, so I think it's safe to assume
23 it's been abandoned.
24
25 What needs maintaining for the new ebuild is
26
27 1) The new java-only upstream version of pdftk that lives at
28 https://gitlab.com/marcvinyals/pdftk/
29
30 2) The ebuild itself
31
32 --
33 Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Somewhere in Tenafly,
34 at New Jersey, a chiropractor
35 gmail.com is viewing "Leave it to
36 Beaver"!