| 1 |
On 03/15/2018 11:04 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On March 15, 2018 9:35:35 PM UTC, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 2018-03-15, thelma@×××××××××××.com <thelma@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> I've compiled the pdftk-9999 (java based) |
| 6 |
>>> gcc-5.4.0-r4 is gone and pdftk is working as it should. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Thank you everybody for the help. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> That's great news! |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Instead of removing pdftk from the portage tree because it depends on |
| 13 |
>> gcc-5.4 [gcj], is there any reason it can't be replace by the one |
| 14 |
>> which uses a jvm instead? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Someone needs to maintain it as well. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
From the "pdftk-9999 --help" |
| 19 |
-----quote---------- |
| 20 |
AUTHOR |
| 21 |
Sid Steward (sid.steward at pdflabs dot com) maintains pdftk. Please |
| 22 |
email him with questions or bug reports. Include pdftk in the |
| 23 |
subject |
| 24 |
line to ensure successful delivery. Thank you. |
| 25 |
-----end quote------- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Thelma |
Archives