| 1 |
On 2/12/2010 10:14 AM, Zeerak Waseem wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> But then the question isn't whether there are a number of soft |
| 4 |
> dependencies, but in the case of semantic-desktop whether -it- is a soft |
| 5 |
> dependency. Like previously stated, I don't use kmail, nor do I intend |
| 6 |
> to (I at least think I mentioned it). This is just my take on the matter |
| 7 |
> of whether it is truly necessary, or even a good idea to have |
| 8 |
> symantic-desktop as a hard dependency. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No, it's not a soft dependency. Yes, it's a hard |
| 11 |
dependency. Yes, it's a good idea. Yes, it's necessary. |
| 12 |
No, no amount of pointless whining about "bloat" is going to |
| 13 |
change things. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you want to use KDE-4 applications, you use semantic |
| 16 |
desktop. If you don't want to use semantic desktop, you |
| 17 |
don't use KDE-4 applications. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yay for choice. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
--Mike |
Archives