1 |
On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
2 |
> I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing |
3 |
> the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I |
4 |
> use don't do that. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy |
7 |
|
8 |
-10 this is plain wrong... |
9 |
|
10 |
Use a mail client that has 'Reply-To-List' function. |
11 |
|
12 |
Thunderbird's works very well no, so there is an excellent |
13 |
cross-platform mail client available that implements this functionality... |
14 |
|
15 |
> as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the |
16 |
> whole mailing list. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> What do you think about changing of policy? |
19 |
|
20 |
+1, but not for the same reasons... |
21 |
|
22 |
Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the |
23 |
Reply-To, but no longer. |