| 1 |
On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing |
| 4 |
> > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I |
| 5 |
> > use don't do that. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> -10 this is plain wrong... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Use a mail client that has 'Reply-To-List' function. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thunderbird's works very well no, so there is an excellent |
| 14 |
> cross-platform mail client available that implements this functionality... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the |
| 17 |
> > whole mailing list. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > What do you think about changing of policy? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> +1, but not for the same reasons... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the |
| 24 |
> Reply-To, but no longer. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have posted |
| 27 |
to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly responded |
| 28 |
has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to it the post |
| 29 |
will not go to the list, but the person that emailed me. Pressing 'l' in |
| 30 |
kmail just brings up an empty to field. This seems to happen only with some |
| 31 |
replies. Will keep an eye out for it to see if it is consistent. |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
Mick |
Archives