| 1 |
On Saturday 03 July 2010 11:55:02 Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing |
| 5 |
> > > the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists |
| 6 |
> > > I use don't do that. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > It is usually better and prefer the "answer to all" policy |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > -10 this is plain wrong... |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Use a mail client that has 'Reply-To-List' function. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Thunderbird's works very well no, so there is an excellent |
| 15 |
> > cross-platform mail client available that implements this |
| 16 |
> > functionality... |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > > as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the |
| 19 |
> > > whole mailing list. |
| 20 |
> > > |
| 21 |
> > > What do you think about changing of policy? |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > +1, but not for the same reasons... |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the |
| 26 |
> > Reply-To, but no longer. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have |
| 29 |
> posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly |
| 30 |
> responded has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to |
| 31 |
> it the post will not go to the list, but the person that emailed me. |
| 32 |
> Pressing 'l' in kmail just brings up an empty to field. This seems to |
| 33 |
> happen only with some replies. Will keep an eye out for it to see if it |
| 34 |
> is consistent. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
OK, just got this baby from Alan: |
| 37 |
================================================== |
| 38 |
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| 39 |
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 40 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Flash stopped working after Firefox 3.6.3- |
| 41 |
>3.6.4 update. |
| 42 |
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:37:53 +0200 |
| 43 |
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-ck-r1; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) |
| 44 |
Cc: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| 45 |
References: <i0gk73$kj6$1@×××××××××××.org> |
| 46 |
<20100702095121.76fe5102@××××××××.fabnetwork> |
| 47 |
<201007031230.55562.michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| 48 |
In-Reply-To: <201007031230.55562.michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| 49 |
MIME-Version: 1.0 |
| 50 |
Content-Type: Text/Plain; |
| 51 |
charset="utf-8" |
| 52 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable |
| 53 |
Message-Id: <201007031337.53868.alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| 54 |
Status: R |
| 55 |
X-Status: N |
| 56 |
X-KMail-EncryptionState: |
| 57 |
X-KMail-SignatureState: |
| 58 |
X-KMail-MDN-Sent: |
| 59 |
================================================== |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
and amidst the headers there's no usual mailing list IDs et al, as is usually |
| 62 |
the case: |
| 63 |
================================================== |
| 64 |
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
| 65 |
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@l.g.o> |
| 66 |
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@l.g.o> |
| 67 |
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@l.g.o> |
| 68 |
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> |
| 69 |
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 70 |
Reply-to: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 71 |
================================================== |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
So, when I enter "l" the response is set directly to Alan, instead of Gentoo |
| 74 |
Users M/L. |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
Alan, any idea why this is so? Do you intentionally copy me in your responses |
| 77 |
to the list? |
| 78 |
-- |
| 79 |
Regards, |
| 80 |
Mick |
Archives