1 |
Alexander Skwar wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>Dale schrieb: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>I agree with your reasons |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
>I don't. Totally wrong. In every aspect. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
>>but some of the others have reasons too. I do |
15 |
>>like my reason better though. LOL I put LOL for those who read text |
16 |
>>only and not HTML. LOL, again. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> |
20 |
>Don't send out HTML, please. Especially, if you don't make |
21 |
>use of HTML features, as it then only wastes bandwidth |
22 |
>with nothing useful being added. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
>>I do wish someone would pick a way and let it be the only way though. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> |
29 |
> |
30 |
>Yep. And it should NOT be your way. Full quotes don't make sense. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
>>It gets confusing when some top post and some bottom post. |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> |
37 |
> |
38 |
>Yep. Then don't do it. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
>> That really |
43 |
>>wears out my mouse wheel. Go down, read a bit, then go up and read a |
44 |
>>bit, then back down again, repeat, repeat. That is when it gets confusing. |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> |
47 |
> |
48 |
>Yep. That's why bullshit like this shouldn't be done. Quotes should |
49 |
>be done in the way I do it. Not because I do it (that's no reason), |
50 |
>but because that's the way it's been done for a long time and (more) |
51 |
>importantly, because it's been proven to be good. |
52 |
> |
53 |
>Alexander Skwar |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
|
57 |
Well, I'm trying to find out where to change it in Mozilla. I'm not |
58 |
having any luck either. I know I saw it once but I left it like it |
59 |
was. I don't change to many settings unless they are just something I |
60 |
see here, desktop settings or something. |
61 |
|
62 |
I just joined this thing so I have no idea how it has been done in the |
63 |
past, I just got here. |
64 |
|
65 |
Dale |