| 1 |
Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 2 |
> Firefox itself has any issues, but it does seem to have a memory leak? |
| 3 |
> hog? something-- which saddens me, because it makes me feel like I'm |
| 4 |
> using Mozilla again, which had these kinds of problems for a long, long |
| 5 |
> time. Firefox was a big relief because it *didn't* have 'that damn |
| 6 |
> Mozilla memory problem', but it seems to have developed it. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
At the end of the day - it's still a massive improvement over anything |
| 9 |
M$ have produced with IE. So long as you know the limitations you can |
| 10 |
work around it - i.e. if you've been playing with alot of tabs, just |
| 11 |
close it down and start it back up again when you're done (a few seconds |
| 12 |
work). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And, I think with one of the tab extensions that you can download it'll |
| 15 |
save the current tabs you have open and recreate them all for you when |
| 16 |
you restart firefox. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I just find Mozilla (Suite) slow and cumbersome, although it does have |
| 19 |
better Javascript support than Firefox (useful for IE-centric sites), |
| 20 |
and Opera is propiritary and has an over-enthuisatic interface (not as |
| 21 |
simple as firefox). Long live firefox! :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jonathan Wright ~ mail at djnauk.co.uk |
| 25 |
~ www.djnauk.co.uk |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
2.6.12-gentoo-r6-djnauk-b2 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2100+ |
| 28 |
up 1 day, 1:53, 3 users, load average: 1.61, 1.48, 1.39 |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
"Sex is often quite funny. You know what's a good definition of |
| 31 |
trust? Two cannibals who agree to give each other oral sex." |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
~ David Bertugli |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives