Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] File transfer via USB?
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:04:01
Message-Id: 73f5fbd3-a172-ba65-bccc-84fae21922a7@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] File transfer via USB? by karl@aspodata.se
1 On 4/23/21 7:45 PM, karl@××××××××.se wrote:
2 > Grant:
3
4 I think you are conflating me for the OP. Easy to do with the same
5 first name. ;-)
6
7 > In that case, your usb-connection (or anything) will probably be a
8 > borderline case to, since that is also a network... But I guess the
9 > thing fobidden is anything makeing the ms-win box recognize and use
10 > somthing to communicate outwards.
11
12 I agree and that such is a possibility and is something that Grant
13 /Edwards/ -- the OP -- will need to make a judgement call on.
14
15 > Don't know much about the windows side, but I found this:
16 > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/766912/raw-ethernet-frames-using-winsock
17 > https://www.winpcap.org/
18 > https://hacked10bits.blogspot.com/2011/12/sending-raw-ethernet-frames-in-6-easy.html
19 > seems to be some programming involved.
20
21 That's about what I had expected. Not many, if any, ready built tools
22 for transferring raw Ethernet frames. Though plenty of scaffolding to
23 create it.
24
25 > Seems it never was, though there were patches:
26 > https://flylib.com/books/en/3.151.1.29/1/
27
28 That's about what I remember.
29
30 > 4.18-rc1 it seems.
31
32 Thank you for finding and sharing that milestone.
33
34 Aside: I don't like using "milestone" to describe the point that was
35 removed. Particularly something I think is good.
36
37 > Ah, forgot that one.
38
39 ;-)
40
41 > About the original question. Here what a few thing I dig up.
42 >
43 > https://www.amazon.com/Laplink-High-Speed-Transfer-Cable-PCmover/dp/B0093H83DW
44
45 This is the USB version of the Laplink cable concept.
46
47 Decidedly different than the old serial & parallel versions of which
48 I've used many times. LapLink, INTERLNK.EXE & INTERSVR.EXE, and '95's
49 Direct Cable Connection used them. I suspect there may have been more
50 that I'm not aware of.
51
52 > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lptransfer/
53
54 Interesting.
55
56 I'm not sure why a separate program was needed. Maybe it didn't
57 monopolize the server side the same way that INTERSVR.EXE did.
58
59 Because INTERLNK.EXE would map a drive to the server and return control
60 to the command prompt / batch script allowing use of the new drive letter.
61
62 > https://github.com/viveris/uMTP-Responder
63
64 Interesting.
65
66 This is most likely to be the lease problematic considering that it
67 turns the Linux end into a /special/ USB flash drive.
68
69 > It is usually simple to setup and use a serial null-modem cable and
70 > run kermit or somthing on the MS-Win side and add a getty (I've used
71 > mgetty) handling the serial port on the linux side.
72
73 Is it wrong that the first thing that came to mind when reading the OP's
74 post is UUCP with as high speed serial as possible?
75
76 I wonder if the USB LapLink (type) cable or USB On The Go gadget cables
77 could present as a multi-megabit serial interface.
78
79
80
81 --
82 Grant. . . .
83 unix || die

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] File transfer via USB? karl@××××××××.se
[gentoo-user] Re: File transfer via USB? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>