Archives
Archives
| From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:43:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44A81BE5.30900@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 | > I found the opposite effect with split ebuilds. Even with the |
| 3 | > unpack/configure step, updating 100 splite packages out of 330+ was many |
| 4 | > hours faster than compiling a huge monolithic everything in the past |
| 5 | |
| 6 | BTW, if you install confcache and enable FEATURES=confcache, it will |
| 7 | speed things up a lot. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Thanks, |
| 10 | Donnie |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | Dale <teendale@×××××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> |