Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:58:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44A8F325.8080503@mid.message-center.info | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? by Donnie Berkholz |
||
| 1 | Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 | > Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 | >> I found the opposite effect with split ebuilds. Even with the |
| 4 | >> unpack/configure step, updating 100 splite packages out of 330+ was many |
| 5 | >> hours faster than compiling a huge monolithic everything in the past |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > BTW, if you install confcache and enable FEATURES=confcache, it will |
| 8 | > speed things up a lot. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | confcache is gone from portage. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Alexander Skwar |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | What, after all, is a halo? It's only one more thing to keep clean. |
| 15 | -- Christopher Fry |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | leszek <leszek@××××××.be> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] X11 monster rebuild forced? Can I defer it? | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |