Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies triggered by backtracking
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:13:47
Message-Id: 20151010231331.66137795@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies triggered by backtracking by Alan McKinnon
1 On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:04:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > > The only difference between those two ebuilds is a slight change in
4 > > the way the ncurses DEPEND is defined. It's hard to say more without
5 > > seeing the full output but you could try re-emerging ncurses.
6
7 > It's a bug in the ebuild and should be reported:
8 >
9 > < >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3[abi_x86_32(-)]
10 > ---
11 > > || ( >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:0/5[abi_x86_32(-)]
12 > >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:5/5[abi_x86_32(-)] )
13 >
14 >
15 > khamul env # eix ncurses
16 > [I] sys-libs/ncurses
17 > Available versions:
18 > (0) 5.9-r3 (~)5.9-r4 5.9-r5(0/5) (~)6.0-r1(0/6)
19 > (5) 5.9-r99(5/5) (~)5.9-r101(5/5) (~)6.0(5/6)
20 >
21 >
22 > The two versions in the || in the ebuild are the same, except one is
23 > SLOT 0 and the other 5, and neither have sub-slot 5. This is impossible
24 > to satisfy.
25
26
27 Don't 5.9-r5 and 5.9-r101 satisfy the dependency?
28
29
30 --
31 Neil Bothwick
32
33 One-seventh of life is spent on Monday.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies triggered by backtracking Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>