1 |
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:04:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > The only difference between those two ebuilds is a slight change in |
4 |
> > the way the ncurses DEPEND is defined. It's hard to say more without |
5 |
> > seeing the full output but you could try re-emerging ncurses. |
6 |
|
7 |
> It's a bug in the ebuild and should be reported: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> < >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3[abi_x86_32(-)] |
10 |
> --- |
11 |
> > || ( >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:0/5[abi_x86_32(-)] |
12 |
> >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:5/5[abi_x86_32(-)] ) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> khamul env # eix ncurses |
16 |
> [I] sys-libs/ncurses |
17 |
> Available versions: |
18 |
> (0) 5.9-r3 (~)5.9-r4 5.9-r5(0/5) (~)6.0-r1(0/6) |
19 |
> (5) 5.9-r99(5/5) (~)5.9-r101(5/5) (~)6.0(5/6) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> The two versions in the || in the ebuild are the same, except one is |
23 |
> SLOT 0 and the other 5, and neither have sub-slot 5. This is impossible |
24 |
> to satisfy. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
Don't 5.9-r5 and 5.9-r101 satisfy the dependency? |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Neil Bothwick |
32 |
|
33 |
One-seventh of life is spent on Monday. |