| 1 |
On 11/10/2015 00:13, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:04:40 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> The only difference between those two ebuilds is a slight change in |
| 5 |
>>> the way the ncurses DEPEND is defined. It's hard to say more without |
| 6 |
>>> seeing the full output but you could try re-emerging ncurses. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> It's a bug in the ebuild and should be reported: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> < >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3[abi_x86_32(-)] |
| 11 |
>> --- |
| 12 |
>>> || ( >=sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:0/5[abi_x86_32(-)] |
| 13 |
>>> =sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r3:5/5[abi_x86_32(-)] ) |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> khamul env # eix ncurses |
| 17 |
>> [I] sys-libs/ncurses |
| 18 |
>> Available versions: |
| 19 |
>> (0) 5.9-r3 (~)5.9-r4 5.9-r5(0/5) (~)6.0-r1(0/6) |
| 20 |
>> (5) 5.9-r99(5/5) (~)5.9-r101(5/5) (~)6.0(5/6) |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> The two versions in the || in the ebuild are the same, except one is |
| 24 |
>> SLOT 0 and the other 5, and neither have sub-slot 5. This is impossible |
| 25 |
>> to satisfy. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Don't 5.9-r5 and 5.9-r101 satisfy the dependency? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
<doh> must be the hangover from last night's dodgy beer... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
There's ">=" there that I totally missed. Sorry for the noise... |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 39 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives