| 1 |
El 16/06/16 a las 11:27, James escribió: |
| 2 |
> One word SECURITY? Trust but verify does come to mind. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The snaps come to "replace" a lack of security that is in Linux, in |
| 6 |
addition to facilitating the installation of all applications from the |
| 7 |
user-space without root privileges. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Is their a version that works on gentoo-hardened? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Hardened or not ... it's matter? What I see here is the "beloved" Mark |
| 14 |
talking about a Snap support in Gentoo, and there Gentoo developers |
| 15 |
working to make it official. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It's true? I don't know. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Were are all the security gurus on at on snaps? Do snaps require systemd |
| 21 |
> or are they PID-1 agnostic? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Supposedly it is agnostic to PID, asking only have some active features |
| 26 |
in the kernel and SELinux or AppArmor using. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Currently, none of the mentioned MACs work as expected with Snap, even |
| 29 |
in the Ubuntu itself. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Dios en su cielo, todo bien en la Tierra |
Archives