1 |
José Maldonado <josemald89 <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new: |
5 |
|
6 |
> |
7 |
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/ |
8 |
> |
9 |
> "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu, Lubuntu, |
10 |
> Ubuntu GNOME, Ubuntu Kylin, Ubuntu MATE, Ubuntu Unity, and Xubuntu," |
11 |
> Canonical's announcement says. "They are currently being validated on |
12 |
> CentOS, Elementary, Gentoo, Mint, OpenSUSE, OpenWrt and RHEL, and are |
13 |
> easy to enable on other Linux distributions." (Ubuntu will continue to |
14 |
> support deb packages, but developers can choose to package applications |
15 |
> as snaps instead of or in addition to debs.)" |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Gentoo is supporting officially Snap packages? Why not Flatpak? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Thank you very much for your responses! Bye! :) |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
One word SECURITY? Trust but verify does come to mind. |
24 |
|
25 |
Containers are not exactly the most secure apparatus, imho. |
26 |
"Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities |
27 |
in appc and docker containers." [1]. So, I want to hear about the robustness |
28 |
of the security on these 'self containerd packages. |
29 |
What exactly creates the codes necessary for the container ? |
30 |
|
31 |
Is their a version that works on gentoo-hardened? |
32 |
|
33 |
Suggestions for firewalling off a system for routine, deep examination |
34 |
and profiling of port activities, would be most welcome. Prima facia, |
35 |
I just have no trust in wonderful ideas from the *buntu crowd, ymmv. |
36 |
|
37 |
Also, it's a really good idea; now maybe *DALE* can get his security |
38 |
VM, in a snap (snapple?, snapit?, snapper?), that is gentoo-hardened |
39 |
blessed? Maybe the snhap designation for secured (Hardeded) snaps? |
40 |
Maybe if it's a hardened, entertainment (video snap) we call them schnapps? |
41 |
|
42 |
I've been bantering about for a couple of years now how clusters (hpc and |
43 |
containers) are going to change everything. Security is the main obstacle |
44 |
now. You know, I'm ready to sip this Kool_aid and ponder the possibilities.... |
45 |
|
46 |
Were are all the security gurus on at on snaps? Do snaps require systemd |
47 |
or are they PID-1 agnostic? |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
James |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
[1] https://github.com/coreos/clair |