Archives
Archives
| From: | R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Cellphone VFAT datestamps versus linux datestamps | ||
| Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2018 03:22:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAAD4mYiJDwL63He8PiUM+sJk_jXTXsU14Hpb7_5iKQ6U5YX6kg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Cellphone VFAT datestamps versus linux datestamps by Walter Dnes |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | > So I went to an event on Friday August 24th, and snapped some pics on |
| 3 | > my cellphone. Let's just say the datestamps were ridiculous. Is there |
| 4 | > a conversion algorithm or program to correct it? This may be a Windows |
| 5 | > versus linux thing. See attached listing... |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | The high order bits are incrementing too quickly. I will check in a |
| 9 | bit, but I think you should parse them into epoch time and flip the |
| 10 | endianness. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | What is the brand and model of your cellphone so I can avoid all |
| 13 | products from that company? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Cellphone VFAT datestamps versus linux datestamps | R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Cellphone VFAT datestamps versus linux datestamps | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |