| 1 |
Am Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 02:46:56PM -0700 schrieb thelma@×××××××××××.com: |
| 2 |
> Nothing scientific, but I was surprised how fast M.2 disk so decided to |
| 3 |
> time how fast GnuCash will load my accounting, her it is: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Box 1.) |
| 6 |
> WD (spinning disk) CPU AMD-8150 (8-core), 16GiB |
| 7 |
> Time to open GnuCash - 23sec. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Box 2.) |
| 10 |
> Samsung SSD 850, CPU AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Quad-Core, 16GiB |
| 11 |
> Time to open GnuCash - 15sec. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I can hardly believe that. Does your duration include the entire boot |
| 14 |
process? If so, the times look quite alright, but that’s not what |
| 15 |
description says. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Can you reproduce the same time when you close and then open gnucash a |
| 18 |
second time? (By then all files should be in cache and startup should be |
| 19 |
significantly faster if indeed the drive is responsible). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Box 3.) |
| 22 |
> M.2 SSD, CPU AMD Ryzen 7, 32Gib |
| 23 |
> Time to open GnuCash - 2.5sec |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If you indeed do include boot times, then I find this too fast. But if it |
| 26 |
does, then not bad. *whistle* |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
| 30 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Just because I wrote a word wrong doesn’t mean that I am imcomentent. |
Archives