1 |
Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 2012-12-02, covici@××××××××××.com <covici@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> >>> Is this a laptop? with no num pad? On my laptop the numpad is mapped to the |
7 |
> >>> keys like you described, so when Num Lock is toggled those keys function as |
8 |
> >>> the num pad. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> You can check if rc-update -s -v | grep numlock (or rc-status -s | grep |
11 |
> >> numlock) shows it being set, otherwise add it to see if this makes a |
12 |
> >> difference. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I think numlock is on by default in newer kernels |
15 |
> |
16 |
> That pretty much sucks. Is that configurable sowewhere? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> > -- just turn it off with the key |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The Numlock key doesn't work with the 3.5 kernel. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > -- I am pretty sure even your laptop has such a simulated key. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> My keyboard does have a numlock key, but it doesn't turn numlock on/off |
25 |
> with the 3.5 kernel. |
26 |
|
27 |
At least with 3.6 kernel and above, the numlock key does work -- I am |
28 |
using a desktop with the regular keyboard. So I wonder if you go to 3.6 |
29 |
will it be any better? |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
33 |
How do |
34 |
you spend it? |
35 |
|
36 |
John Covici |
37 |
covici@××××××××××.com |