1 |
On 2012-12-02, covici@××××××××××.com <covici@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
>>> Is this a laptop? with no num pad? On my laptop the numpad is mapped to the |
5 |
>>> keys like you described, so when Num Lock is toggled those keys function as |
6 |
>>> the num pad. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> You can check if rc-update -s -v | grep numlock (or rc-status -s | grep |
9 |
>> numlock) shows it being set, otherwise add it to see if this makes a |
10 |
>> difference. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I think numlock is on by default in newer kernels |
13 |
|
14 |
That pretty much sucks. Is that configurable sowewhere? |
15 |
|
16 |
> -- just turn it off with the key |
17 |
|
18 |
The Numlock key doesn't work with the 3.5 kernel. |
19 |
|
20 |
> -- I am pretty sure even your laptop has such a simulated key. |
21 |
|
22 |
My keyboard does have a numlock key, but it doesn't turn numlock on/off |
23 |
with the 3.5 kernel. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Grant |