| 1 |
On 6/10/06, Michael Weyershäuser <thedude0001@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Much simplier: |
| 9 |
> > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing |
| 12 |
> portage over NFS is slow like hell... |
| 13 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 14 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> iD8DBQFEioqu6q4f+IV6B/wRAljdAJ9VsOH58DCuPOUDSTBRhgMvLwqHMwCeMySr |
| 17 |
> og8sOr+1r/yf/8Vq7iI3FCo= |
| 18 |
> =qi11 |
| 19 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Michael Weyershäuser, |
| 29 |
I've only seen problems with that setup with very very large tarbars when it |
| 30 |
tries to do the md5sum of them, other than that its fine fore me, using NFS3 |
| 31 |
or NFS4 i forget which right now |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Cynyr |
Archives