From: | "Michael Weyershäuser" <thedude0001@×××.de> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator | ||
Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:10:17 | ||
Message-Id: | 448A8AAF.8090703@gmx.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator by Jeremy Olexa |
1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 | Hash: SHA1 |
3 | |
4 | Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
5 | > |
6 | > Much simplier: |
7 | > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS |
8 | |
9 | I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing |
10 | portage over NFS is slow like hell... |
11 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
12 | Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
13 | |
14 | iD8DBQFEioqu6q4f+IV6B/wRAljdAJ9VsOH58DCuPOUDSTBRhgMvLwqHMwCeMySr |
15 | og8sOr+1r/yf/8Vq7iI3FCo= |
16 | =qi11 |
17 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
18 | -- |
19 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator | Jeremy Olexa <olexa@××××××.edu> |
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator | Andrew Frink <andrew.frink@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator | Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na> |