Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Michael Weyershäuser" <thedude0001@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:10:17
Message-Id: 448A8AAF.8090703@gmx.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator by Jeremy Olexa
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
5 >
6 > Much simplier:
7 > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
8
9 I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
10 portage over NFS is slow like hell...
11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
12 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
13
14 iD8DBQFEioqu6q4f+IV6B/wRAljdAJ9VsOH58DCuPOUDSTBRhgMvLwqHMwCeMySr
15 og8sOr+1r/yf/8Vq7iI3FCo=
16 =qi11
17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 --
19 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator Jeremy Olexa <olexa@××××××.edu>
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator Andrew Frink <andrew.frink@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] An alternative to http-replicator Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na>