| 1 |
On 03/02/2018 02:52 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> I did send a help message first, so that I would know exactly what to do. |
| 3 |
> I followed it. Still, I don't think I received anything even now. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I'm not surprised. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The testing that I did last night when you posted the links caused me to |
| 8 |
believe that the original messages were re-sent to the requester the |
| 9 |
exact same way that they were originally sent. (I actually like that |
| 10 |
feature.) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I sort of expect that you won't get the re-sent message because it will |
| 13 |
very likely fail the same tests that the original message failed. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I know I didn't get anything new for at least 15 or 20 minutes and even |
| 16 |
> then, it was a reply to a recent post. I wouldn't think that would be |
| 17 |
> a missing message from a few days ago. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Maybe it is something else. Maybe it is google on my end in this |
| 20 |
> case anyway. I dunno. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The re-sent messages that I saw were the original message, re-sent. |
| 23 |
This means that they would have the same subject, date, etc, not updated |
| 24 |
for when you requested them to be re-sent. Thus if you're threading |
| 25 |
messages, they will show up in the thread where the original message |
| 26 |
belonged. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Grant. . . . |
| 32 |
unix || die |
Archives