| 1 |
Grant Taylor wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/02/2018 02:52 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I did send a help message first, so that I would know exactly what to |
| 4 |
>> do. I followed it. Still, I don't think I received anything even now. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I'm not surprised. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The testing that I did last night when you posted the links caused me |
| 9 |
> to believe that the original messages were re-sent to the requester |
| 10 |
> the exact same way that they were originally sent. (I actually like |
| 11 |
> that feature.) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I sort of expect that you won't get the re-sent message because it |
| 14 |
> will very likely fail the same tests that the original message failed. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> I know I didn't get anything new for at least 15 or 20 minutes and |
| 17 |
>> even then, it was a reply to a recent post. I wouldn't think that |
| 18 |
>> would be a missing message from a few days ago. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Maybe it is something else. Maybe it is google on my end in this |
| 21 |
>> case anyway. I dunno. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> The re-sent messages that I saw were the original message, re-sent. |
| 24 |
> This means that they would have the same subject, date, etc, not |
| 25 |
> updated for when you requested them to be re-sent. Thus if you're |
| 26 |
> threading messages, they will show up in the thread where the original |
| 27 |
> message belonged. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I admit. This is all over my head. I'm just hoping I didn't miss |
| 33 |
anything important. The biggest thing, some of you figured out what |
| 34 |
happened, created a roach report and hopefully it will lead to a fix at |
| 35 |
some point. Heck, I'm happy that whatever the heck is going on, it will |
| 36 |
be corrected. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Now to go play with my new battery charger. It's a XTAR VC4 with a |
| 39 |
really pretty blue display. O_O |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Dale |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
:-) :-) |
Archives