| 1 |
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:42:45 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > But it's not, not once you eject the virtual CD. Is it really worth |
| 4 |
> > bricking your hardware and invalidating the warranty to get rid of |
| 5 |
> > something that disappears after a couple of microseconds anyway? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> sorry, you're asking the wrong guy that question :) IMHO, yes; IHisHO |
| 8 |
> maybe not. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well, if I got an answer, maybe I wasn't asking the wrong person, as the |
| 11 |
OP didn't reply when I first asked it :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Personally, I wouldn't risk bricking £70+ of hardware when a one line |
| 14 |
config file entry would also get rid of the device. And that's assuming a |
| 15 |
suitably hacked firmware could be found in the first place, and that |
| 16 |
this part of the drive's behaviour was controlled by the flashable |
| 17 |
portion of the firmware. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That's a lot of ifs and a lot more potential hassle to avoid pasting one |
| 20 |
line -) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Accordion: a bagpipe with pleats. |
Archives