| 1 |
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:31:53 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > > Dale wrote: |
| 10 |
> > > > | Chris Brennan wrote: |
| 11 |
> > > > |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list? |
| 12 |
> > > > | |
| 13 |
> > > > | We got this one. I saw one other one too. |
| 14 |
> > > > | Dale |
| 15 |
> > > > | |
| 16 |
> > > > | :-) :-) |
| 17 |
> > > > |
| 18 |
> > > > Ya but you didn't answer my question :D |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same |
| 21 |
> > > address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour for any |
| 22 |
> > > list run by a non-idiot (like this one) |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do people get their |
| 25 |
> > original messages back? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> There's a copy already in their outbox? And a sane mailer (like say |
| 28 |
> kmail) will have put the sent copy there already. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I don't think so. The ML software sends (bounces) every message to all |
| 33 |
subscribers (except those who had chosen the "no-mail" option). It is up |
| 34 |
to the subscribers' server or client to decide what to do with a given |
| 35 |
message when/if they catch this message has already been there. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Anyone, please, correct me if I'm wrong. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives