From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: yubikey | ||
Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:44:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 20140618194344.474aff2c@digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: yubikey by James |
1 | On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:08:21 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > > Anyone using that (with gentoo) ? |
4 | > > Experience? I consider getting one to test and use it .. |
5 | > |
6 | > > Stefan |
7 | > |
8 | > I do not know where to start, so I just try to simplify things |
9 | > Near Field Communications, are a very bad idea, if you care |
10 | > about security. (ybikey) is based on NFC. |
11 | |
12 | The Yubikey NEO uses NFC, the standard models do not use it. |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | Neil Bothwick |
17 | |
18 | RAM = Rarely Adequate Memory |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-user] Re: yubikey | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> |