1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Harry Putnam wrote: |
5 |
> The amd64 faq link posted by Ralph Sooten tells a kind of bleak story |
6 |
> as of June 2005 about there being nothing remarkable about 64 |
7 |
> performance and futher that 32 bit out performs in many areas. It is |
8 |
> also said that for `desktop' use there isn't much point. |
9 |
|
10 |
Somewhere in that FAQ there was a link to the gentoo forum (thread) |
11 |
where I read users were/are having the exact opposite results. They were |
12 |
getting much better results with the 64-bit. |
13 |
|
14 |
I think at the end this becomes one big debate, just like comparing AMD |
15 |
MHz and Intel MHz. |
16 |
My reasoning on whether to compile in a 64-bit environment, or a 32 is |
17 |
quite simple: if you don't want to "hasle" (which so far has not been as |
18 |
emerge sorts out everything it seems for you) of sometimes letting |
19 |
gentoo do tricks for you to run 32 bit programs with a second set of |
20 |
32-bit libs etc, then just stick with 32 all the way. |
21 |
If you want to be stubborn (like me) and use your computer like it's |
22 |
"supposed to be", and with a scense of adventure, use 64-bit. At the end |
23 |
of the day I can say "hey guys, I'm running a 64-bit OS" ;-) |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
> R Slootens link: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml |
27 |
> Leads here: |
28 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#perfup |
29 |
> Which leads here: |
30 |
> http://enterprise.linux.com/enterprise/05/06/09/1413209.shtml?tid=121 |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Do you guys agree with that assessment? |
33 |
|
34 |
The last link has a few comments at the bottom, the last one being: |
35 |
"This benchmark is close to useless as described by the other posters. |
36 |
If anything it goes to show how well Athlon64 copes with non-optimized |
37 |
code." |
38 |
|
39 |
This is pretty much what the users said on the gentoo forum too iirc. |
40 |
|
41 |
Well, to fill you in on my progress.... I have now almost finished |
42 |
compiling my new system with 64-bit, with the exception of |
43 |
mozilla-firefox-bin and openoffice-bin (32-bit). I haven't had any |
44 |
problems yet. The computer is surprisingly fast with compiling although |
45 |
I cannot compare it to 32-bit code on the same machine, so this isn't a |
46 |
comparison, just a remark. I tested the NVidia drivers (64-bit version) |
47 |
last night ... no problems at all either. |
48 |
|
49 |
I think in general the only snatch with 64-bit is that closed-source |
50 |
software not providing 64-bit binaries will have to be run using 32-bit |
51 |
libs. This being said, more and more are and will be in the future, with |
52 |
the exception of companies like macromedia who just blatently refuse to |
53 |
release any 64-bit software, limiting all "it's users" to using a 32-bit |
54 |
browser just to be able to use the flash plugin. |
55 |
|
56 |
Greetings |
57 |
Ralph |
58 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
59 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
60 |
|
61 |
iD8DBQFDl9oHCt0ZF9kLPvYRAkdnAKCgAa+t+edhKvUA6yDyMmaFH8xU/ACfWieg |
62 |
cr/0G2xsBWHansB+W8jiAeo= |
63 |
=Ka8y |
64 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
65 |
-- |
66 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |