Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to?
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:05:09
Message-Id: 200812111805.01106.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to? by Miguel Ramos <2008@miguel.ramos.name>
1 On Donnerstag 11 Dezember 2008, Miguel Ramos wrote:
2 > 2008/12/11 Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>:
3 > > for 8.11 there is already a bug open.
4 > > for 8.12 the ebuild of 8.11 - edited and renamed works fine (I am using
5 > > it since yesterday).
6 >
7 > I'm confused with version numbers. I'm new to the ATI driver.
8 >
9 > Apparently, when you try to get a Radeon HD 3xxx driver from them, you
10 > get the 8.12 driver.
11 > However, when you try to get a FirePro V5700 driver, you get the 8.543
12 > driver (called 8.54.3 on the CCC).
13
14 8.12 is the official number. 8.54 and stuff like that are internal numbers.
15
16 >
17 > Now, ebuild version numbers seem to match the 8.54.something logic.
18 > However, the 8.552 ebuild is for the 8.11 driver...
19 > What is this mess?
20
21 as I said, the package name is the public version number, the ebuild name is
22 the internal version number - the driver itself says 8.552 in the logs.
23
24
25 Just do this:
26 kill X
27 eselect opengl set xorg-x11
28 emerge -C ati-drivers
29 emerge =ati-drivers-8.552-r2 (for 8.11 - you don't miss anything when you wait
30 some days for the 8.12 ebuild)
31 eselect opengl set ati
32 reboot

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild for recent ATI driver, whom to go to? Miguel Ramos <2008@××××××××××××.name>